Investigations find no academic misconductcustom printed wristbands by Li Hongliang: Wuhan UniversityPositively Perfect Potter Fodder: The Harry Potter Lego Key Chain Series Sometimes companies do come to a place that they run out of ideas for promotional items. Although other common promotional items for promotional pens, promotional key chains and promotional mugs are lighter on the company"s budget, might come a little bit boring if given again and again. If I were the client, I would prefer something new and something that spark up my interest. Companies can search for ideas on promotional items online where there are many of possibilities. Some other personalized gifts to consider are aprons, buttons, can coolers, ceramic plates and clipboards. All these items can be personalized with photos any kind of way you observe fit. So can ceramic tiles, custom keychain, mouse pads, keepsake boxes and much, much very much more. You can even add a catchy phrase as well as other type of wording that holds meaning to you or particular person you are buying the gift for. Take into mind any of one"s buddies" interests or passions. If any of them like to travel, when choosing groomsmen gift ideas to just consider. How about a personalized traveling grooming kit? Any traveling bag with engraved identification tags is an option. Are there any game lovers? Some groomsmen gift ideas for video game player your internet site poker set with a leather travel case or a special edition of his favorite board game like Monopoly or Gamble. The Packer"s pro shop is selling the pink hats we saw the c"s wearing the actual Monday night game resistant to the Vikings. Pink jerseys, cool keychain and hats are range of the pink products sold at the pro shop. Deanna Favre"s book detailing her battle against breast cancer can be purchased as well as the Packer"s pro shop. Each product sold a dollar amount will be donated to your American Cancer Society. Now, for all those to buy this online, you need to make sure that you may land by using a silicone keychain product. Take note that when you receive it the actual years web, you can never be certain with excellent. There are some associated with that aren"t of top quality since producer is also not decent. However, due to the low price, tend to be easily influenced to buy understand it. You might also want to look for the brand you will be to splash out on. You should not take risk with cheap brands just to save a fantastic. Again, you need to invest on this, so will need spend overlook the wisely. If another person doesn"t need to have a traditional looking Buddha there a wide range of others to select. One is the laughing Buddha. Laughing Buddhas became popular in homes throughout the globe. These are the statues with the pot belly and a happily laughing Buddha. These statues can feature whether or not standing or sitting Buddha. I have several listings of coupons being made available. You might want to start bidding as a way to enjoy huge discount rates when procuring Dooney lotions.
On January 29, 2018, Wuhan University made an announcement after 2 rounds of investigations that Li Hongliang"s team had not conducted any academic fraud. The investigations were launched due to an academic misconduct report from Ho Wen-Zhe, who suspected academic misconduct in 2 Nature Medicine papers (CFLAR and TMBIM1 papers) published by Li Hongliang"s team.
Li Hongliang is the distinguished professor of "Cheung Kong Scholar Award" of Wuhan University. His team has been focusing on liver metabolic diseases for more than 10 years. Since 2016, Li Hongliang"s team has published 4 papers on Nature Medicine in the field of liver diseases.
Ho Wen-Zhe holds full professorship in both Wuhan University and Temple University. He lost his position as director of the Center for Animal Experiment of Wuhan University when competing with Li Hongliang and other candidates in 2015.
On April 2017, a report from Ho Wen-Zhe alleged that the CFLAR and TIMBIM1 papers of Li Hongliang"s team had academic misconduct. The Academic Committee of Wuhan University (hereafter referred to as "the Committee") immediately launched an academic investigation according to the Detailed Rules of Wuhan University for Investigation and Treatment of Academic Misconduct (hereafter referred to as "the Rules").
Li Deren, Fellow of Chinese Academy of Sciences and Chinese Academy of Engineering, and the Chairman of the Committee, said: "Li Hongliang is a doctor and professor of Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University. We therefore asked the Hospital to lunch the investigation after an internal investigation for 8 months."
On December 18, 2017, an independent panel including 5 experts (3 Fellows of Chinese Academy of Sciences from other universities), examined the original documents related to monkey purchase, verified original records of experiments and raw data, inspected monkeys used in the two papers, and listened to the presentations of Li Hongliang and the main experiment operators.
After the detailed investigation, the panel came to the unanimous conclusion that "there had been no forgery of scientific data."
However, on January 18, 2018, Ho Wen-Zhe published his suspicions again on a personal social network even without any direct evidence. The Committee then started a second investigation according to the report and further held an enlarged meeting of the Committee, attended by 14 members of the Committee (including 7 external peer experts) on January 26, 2018.
"The relevant records and data have been sealed up for safekeeping while the academic investigation was conducted to guarantee that all materials and data are real and valid." Wu Shijing, the deputy secretary-general of the Committee, said.
As for the actual number of monkeys involved in the two papers, the committee members verified the relevant documents on the purchase of monkeys, examined the original records endorsed by operators and the raw data, and listened to Li Hongliang"s presentation on the issue. The main experiment operators Fang Jing, Tian Song, Zhang Rui, Shen Lijun, and Wang Pixiao were inquired by the committee at site.
The verification made clear that 26 monkeys were used in 2 papers, including 10 in AAV8-GFP control group, 8 in AAV8-CFLAR (S1) group and 8 in AAV8-TMBIM1 group; the two papers share the same control group.
Wu Shijing said: "The original documents for application, purchase, transportation, feeding and the whole experimental process of the monkeys involved in the report are authentic. The records of the experiments are valid with complete procedures. No acts of counterfeiting has been found."
Ho Wen-Zhe also suspected the monkey experiment periods in the two papers were less than 30 weeks and 32 weeks respectively. Li Hongliang"s team presented all original records of the experiments, surgical records and original data to the committee. The committee members also inquired the main experiment operators about the experiment details at site, and inspected original documents for the submission, revision and publication of the two papers.
"The whistleblower thought the time of the first AAV injection was at May 2016." said Li Deren, "In fact, they (Li Hongliang"s team) performed the first portal vein injection in March, 2016. The injection in May, 2016 was the second time. Their first submission clarified the period as 20 weeks. Their monkeys were kept alive after 20-week"s examination, and the monkey experiment was still going on. When revising the papers, they updated the monkey data to 30 weeks and 32 weeks respectively, according to reviewers" suggestions. Therefore, there is no academic fraud."
After two rounds of investigations up to 9 months, the committee finally made an unanimous conclusion that Li Hongliang"s team had not conducted any academic fraud on the related contents involved in the report. There were some negligence in the writing of the papers and Li Hongliang"s team has been advised to be more rigorous and meticulous in the future.